A Banker Speaks, With Regret
PHOTO CREDIT:
Damon Winter / The New York Times
Original Op-Ed Column by Nicholas D. Kristof, NEW YORK TIMES
A former banker for Chase Home Finance speaks up about how executives were encouraged to make subprime mortgages and were rewarded for it.
"If you want to understand why the Occupy movement has found such traction, it helps to listen to a former banker like James Theckston. He fully acknowledges that he and other bankers are mostly responsible for the country’s housing mess...
"Theckston says that borrowers made harebrained decisions and exaggerated their resources but that bankers were far more culpable — and that all this was driven by pressure from the top.
“You’ve got somebody making $20,000 buying a $500,000 home, thinking that she’d flip it,” he said. “That was crazy, but the banks put programs together to make those kinds of loans.”
***
"One memory particularly troubles Theckston. He says that some account executives earned a commission seven times higher from subprime loans, rather than prime mortgages. So they looked for less savvy borrowers — those with less education, without previous mortgage experience, or without fluent English — and nudged them toward subprime loans.
"Theckston, who has a shelf full of awards that he won from Chase, such as “sales manager of the year,” showed me his 2006 performance review. It indicates that 60 percent of his evaluation depended on him increasing high-risk loans.
"In late 2008, when the mortgage market collapsed, Theckston and most of his colleagues were laid off. He says he bears no animus toward Chase, but he does think it is profoundly unfair that troubled banks have been rescued while troubled homeowners have been evicted.
"Yet what is scandalous is the basic unfairness of what has transpired. The federal government rescued highly paid bankers from their reckless decisions. It protected bank shareholders and creditors. But it mostly turned a cold shoulder to some of the most vulnerable and least sophisticated people in America. Last year alone, banks seized more than one million homes.
"Sure, some programs exist to help borrowers in trouble, but not nearly enough. We still haven’t taken such basic steps as allowing bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of a mortgage on a primary home. Legislation to address that has gotten nowhere.
"My daughter and I are reading Steinbeck’s “Grapes of Wrath” aloud to each other, and those Depression-era injustices seem so familiar today. That’s why the Occupy movement resonates so deeply: When the federal government goes all-out to rescue errant bankers, and stiffs homeowners, that’s not just bad economics. It’s also wrong.
TOM’S COMMENTARY:
In court, the lawyers for the bankers take such ridiculous positions that it is hard to believe. That makes it all the more refreshing when someone who was deeply enough involved in the mortgage scandal to know what really went on comes clean.
This is a well-written and IMPORTANT column, and I urge you to click the link above and READ THE FULL ARTICLE!
Mr. Kristof has had a brilliant career in journalism, always on the leading edge of uncovering the most important truths.
Read the biography of Nicholas Kristof
.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
The articles here are selected because of
their importance to the subject of the
Foreclosure Scandal / Crisis, or their
helpfulness in keeping you informed.
Each item has a link to the original
article, so you can read the report
first-hand.
The copyright laws prevent me from
reproducing the articles here, so
FOLLOW THE LINKS to get
the whole scoop!
.
